teaching and learning research and innovation investment and business creation

 

March 3: URC presidents testify on job creation, outline what Michigan needs to compete

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORRIDOR
PRESIDENTIAL TESTIMONY
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION

May 15, 2009 — 10 a.m. — Vandenberg Room, Michigan League, U-M campus
Audience: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Higher Education; media

Commitment to the Economy
Speaker: University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman

Good morning and welcome to the campus of the University of Michigan.

On behalf of my colleagues — President Lou Anna Simon of Michigan State and President Jay Noren of Wayne State — we appreciate today’s opportunity to tell you about the University Research Corridor.

We also have with us several of our students, as well as representatives of economic development groups that partner with our universities to help move the state forward.

The URC is two years old, and represents a commitment by our research universities to strengthen Michigan’s economy with innovations and inventions; talented graduates; and an entrepreneurial culture for attracting and growing new business.

We came together as the URC because we believe in the unlimited potential of our state to expand upon a rich heritage of invention and to establish itself as a world leader in innovation and creativity.

We see this unfolding in Detroit, where Wayne State’s Tech Town is a robust incubator of ideas and jobs.

It is a place where Wayne State faculty such as Engineering Professor Greg Auner have launched a startup company — one using materials and methods he developed in his Smart Sensors and Integrated Microsystems lab.

The result is Visca LLC, which is developing and commercializing micro sensors that already have attracted the attention — and the funding — of the Department of Defense.

On all of our campuses, we are accelerating our technology transfer efforts to encourage and reward professors who move inventions and innovations from the lab to the marketplace.

We see the power of the URC in East Lansing, where IBM is connecting with Michigan State to create an application development center on MSU’s campus.

This center will be the first of its kind in the United States for IBM, and it will be housed here, in our state. It says to the world: the state of Michigan knows technology. And it also says “jobs” — up to 1,500 new direct and indirect jobs over the next five years.

We see the muscle of the URC here in Ann Arbor, where the University of Michigan is just weeks away from closing on the purchase of the former R&D headquarters of Pfizer.

Acquiring this parcel of 174 acres and 30 buildings will allow us as a university to take a revolutionary new approach to research. We are examining the best possible uses for this site, but we know it will build upon our research strengths in drug discovery, neuroscience, and health outcomes.

In addition to university research, this new campus will provide incubator space for the private sector. And we expect that over the next 10 years, upward of 3,000 jobs will be created here in southeast Michigan.

As with many of our respective projects, not only will we broaden our contributions as a research university, we also will stimulate new business in region. We believe the two objectives go hand-in-hand.

It’s important to note that MSU also is reviving former Pfizer property, in this case a laboratory in Holland where research will focus on biomaterials, specialty chemicals, and biofuels.

Our entire state was shocked by the loss of Pfizer. But we are confident that U-M’s transformation of the Ann Arbor site into a research dynamo will be equally stunning.

The URC has statewide impact because of the contributions of our staff, faculty and students. President Noren will now tell you about our commitment to attract and support the best students.

Commitment to Michigan Families
Speaker: Wayne State University President Jay Noren

Chairman Stamas, members of the subcommittee — this morning I would like to speak briefly on the commitment of our three institutions to the families of students and prospective students.

When President Coleman, President Simon or I talk to the parents of high-school students who hope to attend one of our universities, most often the first question we hear is not about the curriculum. It’s Can we afford it?

In a tight economy the answer increasingly is that families, even those that have achieved some economic success overall, cannot bear the burden of university costs on their own. More and more the responsibility for making sure students can come to our universities, and stay there through graduation, falls to the universities themselves.

The need is certainly there: For example, in fiscal year 2008-2009 Wayne State University made 15,737 undergraduate scholarship offers, a figure equal to nearly 80 percent of our undergraduate population. The average scholarship award came to $9,026. At Michigan State University, 77 percent of 2008-2009 undergraduates have received some kind of aid so far this academic year, with an average of $12,953. At the University of Michigan, nearly 80 percent of undergraduates who are Michigan residents receive some type of financial aid, at an average of $13,400 per student.

For each of our three universities the guiding principle is this — If we accept you for admission, and your family cannot afford to send you to school, we will provide as much financial assistance as possible.

At Wayne State University, for example, approximately 27 cents of every tuition dollar we receive is returned to students in the form of grants and scholarships. As higher education is absolutely critical to the economic, social and cultural prosperity of Michigan, each of the URC institutions intends to ensure that every deserving student has access regardless of financial circumstances. We regard assistance to students who wish to take advantage of the education we offer but who cannot afford it as an investment not only in these students but also in the future of our state and society.

If we accept that Michigan needs more skilled college graduates in order to compete successfully in the 21st-century’s rapidly transforming global economy, then we have to encourage highly motivated men and women to enter and stay in college. Financial assistance goes a long way toward keeping that motivation alive. Not keeping it alive has excruciating implications, especially when you consider that Michigan already ranks a lackluster 37th in the nation for the percentage of the population with a bachelor’s degree.

Each of our three universities understands that a solid program of financial aid also enables us to ensure an academically strong and culturally diverse student body. We consequently are committed to a providing a variety of flexible financial aid options to students in the form of grants, scholarships, student employment and loans. In 2008-2009 Wayne State University will disburse a total of roughly $262 million in financial aid; the University of Michigan expects to pay out approximately $758 million, while Michigan State anticipates more than $468 million.

If President Obama’s budget passes, federal Pell grants, which provide need-based aid to low-income undergraduate and certain postgraduate students, will increase by $200 to a maximum of $5,550 for the 2010-2011 academic year. More important — for the first time, future increases would be tied to the consumer price index plus 1 percent. The usefulness of Pell grants has steadily declined because of a failure to keep up with inflation, so tying increases to the CPI is a major step forward.

Just by way of illustration: 20 years ago, the maximum Pell Grant covered 60 percent of a student's yearly costs at a public four-year institution; by 2006 that had shrunk almost by half — to about 33 percent. Somewhere in those intervening years the federal government, like many states, apparently decided that higher education for Americans was just not very important, or at least not worthy of adequate financial support.

However, Pell and other need-based grants play a critical role in our efforts to assist students from low-income families. Of the financial aid paid out at Wayne State University this year, $22 million comes from the Pell program and will assist more than 7,800 students. Michigan State University has similar figures, with slightly more than 7,000 students receiving around $21 million in Pell grants. The University of Michigan has paid out almost $20 million to date this year, to more than 3,000 students.

Federal dollars are supplemented at all three URC institutions by state appropriations and private gifts. Each of our universities places significant emphasis on endowed scholarships, which are privately funded; endowed scholarships are perpetual gifts because only the interest is used while the principal continuously grows. Both Wayne State and the University of Michigan recently concluded capital campaigns that included increases in private funding for scholarships, and at Wayne State we have begun a follow-up initiative designed to raise funds specifically for that purpose.

Presidents Coleman and Simon can give you chapter and verse of the many initiatives and programs their universities maintain to relieve families of some of the financial burden of sending a student to college — from the University of Michigan’s new scholarship support for community college transfers to Michigan State’s Adverse Economic Circumstances fund. At Wayne State, we recently significantly improved our financial aid awards for the 2009-10 school year with a one-time doubling of the need-based grants we offer to freshmen, as well as to sophomores, juniors and seniors who have a cumulative grade point average of 3.0 or greater.

I’d like to move away from financial aid for a moment and give you another perspective on the many ways our universities are committed to the well-being of families — in this case one in which all three of our institutions are partners. The National Children’s Study, funded by an $18.5 million research contract from the National Institutes of Health, will monitor more than 100,000 children nationally from before birth to age 21. In Michigan, researchers will recruit and monitor approximately 1,000 participants in Wayne County in the initial phase of the program. As the study progresses, Genesee, Grand Traverse, Lenawee and Macomb counties will be added.

Michigan State University will lead Michigan’s role in the project, while Wayne State will oversee the assessment and care of pregnant women. The University of Michigan will be responsible for enrolling and interviewing study participants and assessing post-natal child development. Other collaborators in the first phase of this effort, the largest of its kind in history, include Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Henry Ford Health System, Michigan Department of Community Health, and the Wayne County and city of Detroit health departments.

Michigan’s economic diversification, and its return to prosperity, will take the kind of vision, imagination and technical expertise present in the University Research Corridor institutions. But even more than that, such a transformation will take people — skilled, knowledgeable and highly motivated men and women. These people will be the graduates of Michigan’s public research universities, and they are the greatest service our institutions can provide to the state and its future.

Thank you.

Commitment to Michigan’s Future
Speaker: Michigan State University President Lou Anna Simon

Michigan’s research universities are focusing on the future. We’re hewing to Michigan’s tradition of bold vision and fostering innovation by creatively applying knowledge to real-world problems.

But let’s acknowledge from the outset that Michigan’s revival will come community by community, building on our unique strengths. And that’s what the URC is about.
We’re already in every county of Michigan, be it advancing health care; facilitating community development; monitoring the environment; promoting better land use; retraining our work force; or extending educational opportunities.

The URC allows us to better align our assets, strengthening our ability to engage statewide while at the same time enhancing our external reach and reputation.

Agri-food/ agri-business is a bedrock component of the state’s economy, one that only continues to grow. Programs such as the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station and MSU Extension will ensure that will continue. Every new breed of crop our researchers develop — when it’s adopted by farmers — that’s university technology transfer in action.

But let me give you some examples of how your research universities are nurturing the other 21st century industries in Michigan.

Life sciences come easily to mind. At Wayne State University’s TechTown research park, Wayne County is backing the state’s first stem cell commercialization lab. Wayne State is aiming to collaborate there not just with Michigan universities, but institutions around the world.

Also at TechTown is an innovative technology company called SenSound, which is commercializing Wayne State technology for three-dimensional sound mapping. SenSound develops software based on mathematical formulas and has landed several SBIR grants and private contracts. It was named one of the Michigan 50 Companies to Watch by the Edward Lowe Foundation in 2006.

And we won’t ignore the auto industry, which continues to offer a platform for our engineering and technology. General Motors and the University of Michigan earlier this year formed a new partnership to develop the next generation of high-efficiency vehicles powered by diverse energy sources.

Just this week, U-M spinoff company Sakti3, joined with GM to seek federal stimulus funding for electric vehicle battery production.

The Department of Energy also recently selected U-M and MSU to help develop high-efficiency internal combustion engines. U-M will explore high-pressure, lean-burn technologies and MSU will work with Chrysler to demonstrate a closed-loop, combustion-controlled engine.

Our universities all maintain longstanding research-and-development links with the Defense Department’s vehicle development center in Warren.

Michigan State’s Composite Vehicle Research Center has two new mid-Michigan companies associated with it. One is commercializing a graphite-based nanomaterial that makes better plastic. The other is developing 3-D weaving technology to give composite fibers more complex patterns and more resistance to impacts.

Let’s talk about energy and fuel. U-M and MSU both are slated to host DOE Energy Frontier Research Centers, part of a big federal push for energy breakthroughs. MSU will lead a $12.5-million program, working with U-M and Wayne State, to improve electricity transmission technology by converting heat back into electricity.

Using another recent DOE grant, of $19.5 million, U-M will explore new materials to better convert solar energy to electricity.

MSU a while ago landed a large share of the DOE’s $135-million Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center. That project involves 36 key scientists and $900,000 in monthly research expenditures.

We’re attacking bio-fuels from a lot of angles, including an Agricultural Experiment Station program compiling genetic databases of biofuel crops and a development program to pre-treat crop waste to make cellulosic ethanol easier.

We also recently landed a $1.4-million federal allocation for a new bio-fuel research program at the MSU Upper Peninsula Tree Improvement Center in Escanaba, partnering with Michigan Technological University.

The DOE in December awarded MSU the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams. That half-billion-dollar-plus facility will attract top scientists from around the world to Michigan to make new discoveries about our universe.

You’ve probably heard that F-RIB is expected to bring a billion dollars in economic activity and hundreds of jobs to Michigan. You might not know that one of our senior physicists is also a high-technology manufacturing entrepreneur.

Terry Grimm is president of Niowave in Lansing, which just acquired a Virginia company that will better position it to supply components for superconducting particle accelerators around the world. They also hire former autoworkers, who have been retrained through a Lansing Community College program.

We in the URC are applying our technologies to leverage Michigan’s traditional — and still formidable — strengths in manufacturing and chemical industry innovation. Private investors are validating us, even in this troubled economy.

There’s Draths Corp., a next-generation chemical company in Okemos based on MSU’s “green science.” Draths is scaling up to manufacture the chemicals used to make nylon, coatings and other products using renewable resources instead of petrochemicals. ...

Draths was founded by MSU chemists John and Karen Frost. The company raised $21 million dollars in new venture funding in the first quarter of this year, despite the worst quarter for venture capital in 12 years.

To their investors, the Frosts are emphasizing the value of Michigan’s human and physical assets. Draths already employs former Pfizer scientists and now is talking to former Dow Chemical people.

All told, they expect to add about 200 researchers and administrators over the next 10 years. These are, in John’s words, “gold collar jobs,” with an average salary of $85,000 or more.

Like us, the Frosts are committed to Michigan. They are working with the MEDC to locate or build a $20-million pilot manufacturing plant, looking to operate in places such as Kalamazoo, Midland and Ann Arbor.

At the same time, home-grown Ann Arbor company, Lycera — a University of Michigan technology spinoff — also closed on $36 million dollars of venture capitalization in the first quarter.

That company focuses on the life science side of chemistry, developing small-molecule drugs for treating autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

That’s a sample of what your research universities are doing to help transition Michigan to a 21st century, knowledge-based economy — while we also strive to be better, more accessible partners to Michigan businesses and entrepreneurs.

Importance of Collaboration
Speaker: Simon

  • Our work involves working closely with partners equally committed to strengthening the state’s economy.
  • Introduce respective speakers:
    • MSU: David Hollister of Prima Civitas
    • U-M: Mike Finney of Ann Arbor Spark
    • WSU: Randall Charlton of Tech Town

Message: Encouraging Entrepreneurs
Speaker: Noren

  • We are committed to building a culture of entrepreneurship and innovation on our campuses, among both faculty and students.
  • Today we want you to hear directly from students who are making a difference with their inventions and initiative.
  • Introduce respective students:
    • WSU: Samantha Staley
    • MSU: Elizabeth Kunkle
    • U-M: Jeff LeBrun

Closing
Speaker: Coleman

All of us appreciate the opportunity to share our stories with you today.

Just last month, we heard a loud and clear message from the organization known as Michigan Future. It told us that jobs requiring only a high school diploma are evaporating, and the real growth in employment is in fields that demand a college degree.

The prosperity that any of us wants — for our personal growth and the wellbeing of our communities and our state — that prosperity comes with a higher education.

The University Research Corridor is proud to contribute to Michigan’s wellbeing. We look forward to working with you on our shared future as a state that values and celebrates knowledge as an economic engine.

 

Photos by Austin Thomason
U-M Photo Services

Michigan State University University of Michigan Wayne State University